Below is an account of what I took away after watching WWE's Night of Champions pay-per-view.
Air Boom (c) vs. Awesome Truth (Tag Team Titles)
I was really looking forward to this match and for the most part, it delivered. Let me go on record as saying that I think that The Miz and R-Truth as a tag team have a legitimate chance of becoming this generation's Edge and Christian as a comedy tag team that are taken seriously in the ring and that we are always happy to see grab a mic, which will be often. I also think it's awesome that the tag team division has been revitalized for the very reason that guys like Kofi Kingston and Evan Bourne won't get lost in the shuffle as often. Although the match was thrown out, the ending totally made sense and I was fine with it considering that they're trying to sell the conspiracy angle for Miz and Truth. The moment Bourne tagged in without actually tagging in, I got all excited and yelled conspiracy!, and then later when Miz and Truth had a legit tag that went unnoticed. Loved the story of the match and where this is going for both teams.
Cody Rhodes (c) vs. Ted Dibiase (Intercontinental Title)
Honestly, I fast-forwarded through this. Absolutely no interest in Rhodes at all. Don't understand why he has to sound like the emperor from Star Wars, or Kane from a few years back. He doesn't even need the mask anymore and the gimmick is getting real old. Always thought Dibiase had potential, but they've done nothing with him and this match had just been thrown together. I didn't watch it, because I'm basically just shrugging my shoulders at this whole situation.
Christian/Sheamus In-Ring Promo Segment
It sucks that Christian wasn't on the card (and on an unrelated not, Bryan Danielson for that matter, too), but what can you do. Christian, as always, was great on the mic and it was interesting to basically see the whole crowd on his side for "one more match" when obviously they're not supposed to. I honestly don't really like Sheamus, and fast-forward all his matches, but even the unbiased side of me thinks he's really terrible as a babyface. He's not funny, not interesting, and unless you're Irish, which, considering all the nationalities that make up a WWE audience, there's not a big percentage, his promos about his motherland aren't really that compelling. This Sheamus as a face thing just isn't working out.
Dolph Ziggler (c) vs. Jack Swagger vs. John Morrison vs. Alex Riley (US Title)
Pretty decent match here. Even though it seemed like an obvious prediction going in, I really thought Swagger was going to win to add that dynamic to the Ziggler/Swagger/Vickie triangle, so it was interesting that they kept the title on Ziggler, whom I am a fan of. It would be really nice to see Dolph get a drawn-out, well written feud soon. With Vickie's post-match backstage promo taking credit for Ziggler's win, it would appear that Dolph's time dealing with her may be running out soon, anyway.
Randy Orton (c) vs. Mark Henry (World Heavyweight Championship)
I have to say that over the past year, Orton has probably become my most unliked guy in WWE. And by that, I mean that when he comes on TV, I go, "ugh, this guy is so f'n boring, I can't take it anymore." See, at least with Cena, he might be corny as all hell, but at least he's somewhat interesting in the fact that the crowd is always hot one way or the other when he's in the ring doing something. Orton is just flat out boring. So when Mark Henry won, it was awesome to see shots of stupid girls in the crowd looking bummed out. Anyway, as for Henry, I gotta say...I'm kinda, sorta, maybe buying it. I wasn't at all until that final promo on Smackdown, which wasn't great by any stretch, but was more than solid enough to get behind him a bit, which is about four hundred times more than I could ever say for any Mark Henry storyline push. The title match itself was not exciting, but booked excellently, with Henry being dominant and winning clean, and his post-match promo was very good as well, especially when he said he wasn't sharing the moment with "none of ya'll!" With a little more mic time, and I can't believe I'm saying this, but Mark Henry has potential to be a halfway decent champ.
CM Punk/John Laurinaitus Backstage Promo
I'm skipping past the Del Rio portion and only mentioning this segment because I thought it was awesome when Punk used Larry David's "pretty, pretty" line when saying that "that almost sounded pretty, pretty sincere". Seriously, I've checked to see if Laurinaitis had an IMDB page three times the past few months just to make sure that he doesn't actually play Marty Funkhauser on Curb Your Enthusiasm. It's awesome Punk is acknowledging the obvious, and hilarious, similarities.
Kelly Kelly (c) vs. Beth Phoenix (WWE Divas Championship)
Ugh, they dropped the ball hardcore here. Believe it or not, this was one of the top three matches from a storyline perspective that I was looking forward to seeing (which actually speaks high to what WWE has been doing lately with its lesser divisions), and they blew it. Look, I've always thought Beth Phoenix was a top tier women's talent, and this whole Divas of Doom angle has been the first time I've been interested in a women's division storyline since...Trish Stratus was around? With Beth losing to Kelly two straight pay-per-views, and Natalya losing to Kelly on a Raw in between, they've just completely OBLITERATED any credibility and momentum that the team had. What a waste and terrible to decision to keep the title on Kelly. Worst moment of the night.
Alberto Del Rio (c) vs. John Cena (WWE Championship)
It's not often I root for Cena in a storyline (and even here, I'm using the word "root" loosely), but I'm just not buying what Del Rio is selling, and I don't think anyone else really is either. As a person who generally roots for heels, I wanted to like Del Rio, but I just don't. The guy offers nothing either on the mic or in the ring of any interest. Even though I technically want Cena to win this feud, it's hard not to sit in disgust and watch Cena get that title back again after just losing it for the millionth time. At this rate, Cena is going to pass Flair by next June.
CM Punk vs. Triple H
Just like the events during this match, my attempt to write anything coherent is jumbled. No complaints really, and the match itself was pretty decent, and I totally get and even buy everything they were trying to accomplish storyline-wise, but everything was a bit complicated and busy is all. Just so many moving parts between the two competitors themselves, Miz and R-Truth, the two referees, Marty Funkhauser, then Kevin Nash, all the while Trips and Punks are going back and forth between fighting outsiders off and having their own match, it was just a bit much. Thought it would have been much more interesting if Trips lost and in the process lost the COO gig, but I'm not going to complain and do armchair booking between "they should have done this so they can do that", because I'm sure they've got it covered. Plus, the match left a lot of questions to be answered on Raw.
Overall, I thought it was a pretty good PPV. Nothing spectacular, but very solid. Plus it kept all the storylines moving forward. Let's see where they go from here.
A thought provoking blog that encourages readers to think both in and outside the box on a wide array of topics such as sports, literature, film, music, games, and life in general. Don't get verbally knocked out.
(This new blog is still under heavy construction. Check back soon for further updates.)
Monday, September 19, 2011
Thursday, September 8, 2011
NFC Divisional Predictions
(No long, hundred-thousand word, well-constructed article this time
around...just a quick glance at how I think the standings will play out
this year in the NFC off the top of my head.)
NFC East
1. Dallas Cowboys (11-5)
It's tough for Jerry Jones' Cowboys to ever be a "sleeper", but with so much hype over the Eagles, they kind of fit the bill. Granted, this prediction is solely based on health, especially Tony Romo's, but this is a ridiculous offense in the making. Postseason flubs aside, they've always been a good regular season team under Romo, and now that he'll be around for a full year with Dez Bryant to go along with Austin and Witten, two receivers whom he already has a good rapport with, and there's some great options. Also, I think with Felix Jones finally getting the starting gig, he has top five running back potential and is my prime candidate for breakout star, a la Arian Foster last season. Expect Dallas to win in a lot of shootouts.
2. Philadelphia Eagles (11-5, Wild Card)
I don't fully buy the hype right now. Maybe next year, but not in 2011. Aside from the new signees having a short period of time to learn the new system, Michael Vick will have to be as good as he was last season for them to live up to the hype. Forget the injury risks that come with him, but he put up unbelievable numbers last year, especially when it came to avoiding interceptions; that won't be easy to repeat. Still, they do have a very good team and they should practically be a lock to make the playoffs. Like Jones for Dallas, look for LeSean McCoy to get much more national exposure.
3. New York Giants (8-8)
The Giants might be DOA at the get-go based on all of their defensive injuries during the preseason. They'll have to start strong to have a chance, considering the second half of their schedule features games against the Cowboys twice, Patriots, Eagles, Saints, Packers, and Jets. Fortunately for them, they essentially only play seven road games with the game against the Jets coming on the "road". The offense is going to really have to carry the team for them to have a chance. I'd look for the Giants to struggle this year, get a cushy schedule for next, and come back strong in 2012.
4. Washington Redskins (5-11)
The Skins could be looking at 0-5 (Giants, Cardinals, Cowboys, Rams, Eagles), before they know what hit them. The Grossman/Beck quarterback platoon shouldn't exactly incite fear in opposing defenses, and the Tim Hightower bandwagon might come off the track when he's seeing eight men in the box on every carry.
NFC North
1. Green Bay Packers (12-4)
I can't decide between 13-3 or 11-5 for them this year, so 12-4 it is. In any event, the champs are pretty loaded and are likely the league's most well-rounded team. Aaron Rodgers will be poised for a defense of his WCW title atWrestlemania 28 Super Bowl XLVI.
2. Detroit Lions (8-8)
I can't do it, I just can't. I want to type "9-7" so badly, but much like I claimed against the Browns...it's the Lions. I have to see it to believe the hype. I also have to see Matthew Stafford stay healthy for a full season, too. We should know what type of season they're heading for with how they start the first three weeks against somewhat formidable opponents, but opponents that good teams beat. Even so, for the millions on the LBP (Lions Playoff Bandwagon), they'll need a strong start because four of their last six are against the Packers twice, the Saints, and the Chargers.
3.Chicago Bears (8-8)
Tough start to the season, with the Falcons, Saints, and Packers, but it gets easier from then on. Still, it'd be hard to believe that the Bears will be as good as last season, and one of their key weapons, Devin Hester's kickoff return ability, just got negated by the rule change. They also added Dallas' baggage in Marion Barber and Roy Williams, so that's not a good sign.
4. Minnesota Vikings (6-10)
I truly don't know what to think about this team. The one thing I know is that they're not good. Poor Adrian Peterson. From Tavaris Jackson, to an over the hill Brett Favre, to an over the hill Donovan McNabb. Can this guy get a decent quarterback in his prime?
NFC South
1. Atlanta Falcons (11-5)
I originally had the Saints slated here, in part because I hate going with trendy teams like the Falcons (it usually backfires), but this offense is that good, and the defense isn't too shabby either. If Julio Jones is as good as they hope, this is gonna be one tough offense to stop.
2. New Orleans Saints (11-5, Wild Card)
The Saints are essentially everything we know they've been the past few years under Drew Brees, nothing more, nothing less. That should be enough to get them a good record and a playoff spot.
3. Tampa Bay Buccaneers (8-8)
Josh Freeman, LeGarette Blount, and Mike Williams are a really nice core who are all trending upwards. Not having the creampuff schedule again will hurt, but having a worse record this year shouldn't be a negative. They have a bright future, but have some more building to do.
4. Carolina Panthers (3-13)
If nothing else, they should be an interesting team based on the intrigue of Cam Newton. They'll probably be in a lot more games than their record will indicate.
NFC West
1. Arizona Cardinals (8-8)
I have no intelligent analysis here; my Cards prediction is based off almost nothing that has to do with them: I think the Rams are better but their schedule begins way too tough, the other teams are a crap taco, and I only think they'll have eight wins because I'm picking them to win the division and it'd be unbelievable if a team with a losing record won their division and made the playoffs after it had never been done once before. I'm shrugging my shoulders at the Cardinals and moving on. (Author's note: I think I've incorrectly predicted the NFC West champ like seven years in a row...sorry Arizona.)
2. St. Louis Rams (7-9)
I think they're a halfway decent team on the upswing who is the best team in the division, but here's how their schedule starts: Eagles, at Giants, Ravens, Redskins, at Packers, at Cowboys, Saints. I wouldn't be shocked if they won one or two of those games, but they very might well be 1-6 going into the back nine. Granted, that still might be good enough to keep them in the division race. Can we please just contract the NFC West already?
3.Seattle Seahawks (3-12-1)
Tavaris Jackson.
4. San Francisco 49ers (3-12-1)
Alex Smith...for the seventh straight year.
NFC East
1. Dallas Cowboys (11-5)
It's tough for Jerry Jones' Cowboys to ever be a "sleeper", but with so much hype over the Eagles, they kind of fit the bill. Granted, this prediction is solely based on health, especially Tony Romo's, but this is a ridiculous offense in the making. Postseason flubs aside, they've always been a good regular season team under Romo, and now that he'll be around for a full year with Dez Bryant to go along with Austin and Witten, two receivers whom he already has a good rapport with, and there's some great options. Also, I think with Felix Jones finally getting the starting gig, he has top five running back potential and is my prime candidate for breakout star, a la Arian Foster last season. Expect Dallas to win in a lot of shootouts.
2. Philadelphia Eagles (11-5, Wild Card)
I don't fully buy the hype right now. Maybe next year, but not in 2011. Aside from the new signees having a short period of time to learn the new system, Michael Vick will have to be as good as he was last season for them to live up to the hype. Forget the injury risks that come with him, but he put up unbelievable numbers last year, especially when it came to avoiding interceptions; that won't be easy to repeat. Still, they do have a very good team and they should practically be a lock to make the playoffs. Like Jones for Dallas, look for LeSean McCoy to get much more national exposure.
3. New York Giants (8-8)
The Giants might be DOA at the get-go based on all of their defensive injuries during the preseason. They'll have to start strong to have a chance, considering the second half of their schedule features games against the Cowboys twice, Patriots, Eagles, Saints, Packers, and Jets. Fortunately for them, they essentially only play seven road games with the game against the Jets coming on the "road". The offense is going to really have to carry the team for them to have a chance. I'd look for the Giants to struggle this year, get a cushy schedule for next, and come back strong in 2012.
4. Washington Redskins (5-11)
The Skins could be looking at 0-5 (Giants, Cardinals, Cowboys, Rams, Eagles), before they know what hit them. The Grossman/Beck quarterback platoon shouldn't exactly incite fear in opposing defenses, and the Tim Hightower bandwagon might come off the track when he's seeing eight men in the box on every carry.
NFC North
1. Green Bay Packers (12-4)
I can't decide between 13-3 or 11-5 for them this year, so 12-4 it is. In any event, the champs are pretty loaded and are likely the league's most well-rounded team. Aaron Rodgers will be poised for a defense of his WCW title at
2. Detroit Lions (8-8)
I can't do it, I just can't. I want to type "9-7" so badly, but much like I claimed against the Browns...it's the Lions. I have to see it to believe the hype. I also have to see Matthew Stafford stay healthy for a full season, too. We should know what type of season they're heading for with how they start the first three weeks against somewhat formidable opponents, but opponents that good teams beat. Even so, for the millions on the LBP (Lions Playoff Bandwagon), they'll need a strong start because four of their last six are against the Packers twice, the Saints, and the Chargers.
3.Chicago Bears (8-8)
Tough start to the season, with the Falcons, Saints, and Packers, but it gets easier from then on. Still, it'd be hard to believe that the Bears will be as good as last season, and one of their key weapons, Devin Hester's kickoff return ability, just got negated by the rule change. They also added Dallas' baggage in Marion Barber and Roy Williams, so that's not a good sign.
4. Minnesota Vikings (6-10)
I truly don't know what to think about this team. The one thing I know is that they're not good. Poor Adrian Peterson. From Tavaris Jackson, to an over the hill Brett Favre, to an over the hill Donovan McNabb. Can this guy get a decent quarterback in his prime?
NFC South
1. Atlanta Falcons (11-5)
I originally had the Saints slated here, in part because I hate going with trendy teams like the Falcons (it usually backfires), but this offense is that good, and the defense isn't too shabby either. If Julio Jones is as good as they hope, this is gonna be one tough offense to stop.
2. New Orleans Saints (11-5, Wild Card)
The Saints are essentially everything we know they've been the past few years under Drew Brees, nothing more, nothing less. That should be enough to get them a good record and a playoff spot.
3. Tampa Bay Buccaneers (8-8)
Josh Freeman, LeGarette Blount, and Mike Williams are a really nice core who are all trending upwards. Not having the creampuff schedule again will hurt, but having a worse record this year shouldn't be a negative. They have a bright future, but have some more building to do.
4. Carolina Panthers (3-13)
If nothing else, they should be an interesting team based on the intrigue of Cam Newton. They'll probably be in a lot more games than their record will indicate.
NFC West
1. Arizona Cardinals (8-8)
I have no intelligent analysis here; my Cards prediction is based off almost nothing that has to do with them: I think the Rams are better but their schedule begins way too tough, the other teams are a crap taco, and I only think they'll have eight wins because I'm picking them to win the division and it'd be unbelievable if a team with a losing record won their division and made the playoffs after it had never been done once before. I'm shrugging my shoulders at the Cardinals and moving on. (Author's note: I think I've incorrectly predicted the NFC West champ like seven years in a row...sorry Arizona.)
2. St. Louis Rams (7-9)
I think they're a halfway decent team on the upswing who is the best team in the division, but here's how their schedule starts: Eagles, at Giants, Ravens, Redskins, at Packers, at Cowboys, Saints. I wouldn't be shocked if they won one or two of those games, but they very might well be 1-6 going into the back nine. Granted, that still might be good enough to keep them in the division race. Can we please just contract the NFC West already?
3.Seattle Seahawks (3-12-1)
Tavaris Jackson.
4. San Francisco 49ers (3-12-1)
Alex Smith...for the seventh straight year.
AFC Divisional Predictions
(No long, hundred-thousand word, well-constructed article this time around...just a quick glance at how I think the standings will play out this year in the AFC off the top of my head.)
AFC East
1. New England Patriots (14-2)
The Pats will be the best team in football this year. Too many offensive weapons and a monstrous defensive line. Their secondary is still below average, but they made impactful additions on both sides of the ball. The fact that they'll be looking for blood after being outed by the rival Jets in the playoffs makes them very dangerous. Scary team.
2. New York Jets (10-6, Wild Card)
The Jets took a big hit being unable to resign key players in order to get under the new salary cap. The typically top-notch offensive line is now questionable outside of Mangold and Ferguson, the defensive, although very good, is a little overrated. What's underrated is losing Edwards and his good rapport with Sanchez, along with their wild cat formation with Brad Smith. That will be a problem they'll have all year and will help contribute to their first-round playoff exit. (Author's note: The realistic Jets fan in me believes that other Jets fans will take the two AFC title game appearances for granted and expect them to, at the least, make it back there again and will be shocked as they get bounced in the first round or narrowly miss the playoffs and say, "hey, wait a minute...aren't we supposed to go to the title game?" Second author's note: The pessimistic Jets fan in me believes a heart-breaking loss to the Giants in week 16 will take the Jets out of playoff contention, while also doubling as the highlight of the season for the third place G-Men.)
3. Miami Dolphins (5-11)
Not that Kyle Orton is the second coming of Dan Marino, but the Dolphins really should have pushed harder to acquire him from Denver in a trade. Now they'll be stuck with Chad Henne and Matt Moore all year. Their only hope is that Reggie Bush somehow learns to play in the pros after all these years, although, that's obviously highly unlikely.
4. Buffalo Bills (4-12)
I literally just sat here for the last five minutes trying to think of something, anything of interest to say about the Bills. Yeah, that about sums it up.
AFC North
1. Pittsburgh Steelers (13-3)
Ben Roethlisberger for all sixteen, a healthy Troy Polamalu, Mike Wallace ready to become an elite receiver, and the best defense in football. It's never cool or edgy to peg the Steelers for success, but the bottom line is, they're almost always there in the end. Safest pick each year to make.
2. Baltimore Ravens (10-6, Wild Card)
I went back and forth on 10-6 and 9-7 for the Ravens this season. Like Ray Lewis, the defense is older and may not be as good as advertised this year, but Joe Flacco will take the next step and Ray Rice will contend for the rushing title.
3. Cleveland Browns (8-8)
Trendy team that people are predicting will be good. I tossed that aside, saying, "meh, it's the Browns." Then I looked at their schedule. Looks like they've got something similar to the Cheifs' and Bucs' schedules last season; I don't have them playing a team with a winning record until week nine, and only two overall until five weeks remain. The only problem: four of their last five are against the Steelers and Ravens. Seriously, they close with Ravens, Steelers, Cardinals, Ravens, and Steelers, with three of those final four on the road. How does that happen? So I currently have them pegged to be 8-3 before gacking away the last five. I mean hey, it's the Browns.
4. Cincinnati Bengals (2-14)
This team should be all different types of stinky. Fourteen different types, to be exact.
AFC South
1. Houston Texans (10-6)
Ugh, I hate this pick. I'm a big fan of, "if you've always done something, prove otherwise until I pick it" (whether it's bad or good). And, let's face it, every year, everyone is big on the Texans, and then they let everyone down. I'm proud to say I never fall for this with them, but I mean, with Peyton Manning being out for way longer than we thought, and no other great competition in the division, it's now or never, right? The schedule isn't brutal, either. I think if they can't win this year, they should be forced to contract.
2. Tennessee Titans (7-9)
A big change of culture in Tennessee this year. Obviously, Matt Hasselbeck isn't part of the future, but he should be good enough to not keep them terrible, which had essentially been his career motto in Seattle.
3. Indianapolis Colts (5-11)
I generally pick the Colts the complete opposite of the Texans: prove you won't win all these games and the division, and then I'll pick against you. But with Manning's sudden neck surgery and an uncertainty on when he will return this year, if at all, yikes, they're in trouble. No team needs one player more than the Colts, and we're about to find out why. When the only hope is that an ancient Kerry Collins doesn't get hurt so we don't have to see Curtis Painter, that's trouble. The good news is, they might become so bad that they end up with a top-tier draft pick that they can use for years to come.
4. Jacksonville Jaguars (4-12)
Very odd decision to let David Garrard go right before the season starts, especially when Blaine Gabbert isn't going to be thrown right into the fire. Keeping Maurice Jones-Drew on the field will be their only chance of staying competitive.
AFC West
1. San Diego Chargers (12-4)
I'm completely buying into the hype, which is strange, because as a fan, I usually don't do that sort of thing, but everything is in place. Barring significant injuries, this is going to be a really tough offense to contain. Philip Rivers has "passing title" written all over him considering the miracles he worked last year throwing to receivers named Seyi Ajirotutu and Legedu Naanee. Replace that with Vincent Jackson and Antonio Gates, and good luck. Plus, the Bolts had a historically bad special teams coverage unit last year, and with the kickoff rule change, added to the fact that no one could be that bad twice, and that adds two or three extra wins to their total. Lastly, put me on record as saying the streak of them starting slow ends this year. They'll win four of their first five and cruise with no true divisional competition. Buy the hype.
2. Kansas City Chiefs (7-9)
The Chiefs benefited from a cupcake schedule last season; this year's isn't so kind. It starts off somewhat innocent, then weeks 11-15 are at the Patriots, home for the Steelers, at the Bears, at the Jets, and home against the Packers. Parlay that with three of four losses against the Chargers and Raiders, plus another random one sprinkled in, and there's nine losses.
3. Oakland Raiders (7-9)
The offense has a chance to be good, but they'll never be a playoff team again under Al Davis.
4. Denver Broncos (5-11)
Honestly, they're not going to contend anyway. They should have just traded Kyle Orton for a draft pick and let everyone see if Tim Tebow was still worth talking about. If he is, great, that'll sell some tickets and merchandise, and perhaps give them a game plan for the future. If not, then the hype ends and we can move on.
AFC East
1. New England Patriots (14-2)
The Pats will be the best team in football this year. Too many offensive weapons and a monstrous defensive line. Their secondary is still below average, but they made impactful additions on both sides of the ball. The fact that they'll be looking for blood after being outed by the rival Jets in the playoffs makes them very dangerous. Scary team.
2. New York Jets (10-6, Wild Card)
The Jets took a big hit being unable to resign key players in order to get under the new salary cap. The typically top-notch offensive line is now questionable outside of Mangold and Ferguson, the defensive, although very good, is a little overrated. What's underrated is losing Edwards and his good rapport with Sanchez, along with their wild cat formation with Brad Smith. That will be a problem they'll have all year and will help contribute to their first-round playoff exit. (Author's note: The realistic Jets fan in me believes that other Jets fans will take the two AFC title game appearances for granted and expect them to, at the least, make it back there again and will be shocked as they get bounced in the first round or narrowly miss the playoffs and say, "hey, wait a minute...aren't we supposed to go to the title game?" Second author's note: The pessimistic Jets fan in me believes a heart-breaking loss to the Giants in week 16 will take the Jets out of playoff contention, while also doubling as the highlight of the season for the third place G-Men.)
3. Miami Dolphins (5-11)
Not that Kyle Orton is the second coming of Dan Marino, but the Dolphins really should have pushed harder to acquire him from Denver in a trade. Now they'll be stuck with Chad Henne and Matt Moore all year. Their only hope is that Reggie Bush somehow learns to play in the pros after all these years, although, that's obviously highly unlikely.
4. Buffalo Bills (4-12)
I literally just sat here for the last five minutes trying to think of something, anything of interest to say about the Bills. Yeah, that about sums it up.
AFC North
1. Pittsburgh Steelers (13-3)
Ben Roethlisberger for all sixteen, a healthy Troy Polamalu, Mike Wallace ready to become an elite receiver, and the best defense in football. It's never cool or edgy to peg the Steelers for success, but the bottom line is, they're almost always there in the end. Safest pick each year to make.
2. Baltimore Ravens (10-6, Wild Card)
I went back and forth on 10-6 and 9-7 for the Ravens this season. Like Ray Lewis, the defense is older and may not be as good as advertised this year, but Joe Flacco will take the next step and Ray Rice will contend for the rushing title.
3. Cleveland Browns (8-8)
Trendy team that people are predicting will be good. I tossed that aside, saying, "meh, it's the Browns." Then I looked at their schedule. Looks like they've got something similar to the Cheifs' and Bucs' schedules last season; I don't have them playing a team with a winning record until week nine, and only two overall until five weeks remain. The only problem: four of their last five are against the Steelers and Ravens. Seriously, they close with Ravens, Steelers, Cardinals, Ravens, and Steelers, with three of those final four on the road. How does that happen? So I currently have them pegged to be 8-3 before gacking away the last five. I mean hey, it's the Browns.
4. Cincinnati Bengals (2-14)
This team should be all different types of stinky. Fourteen different types, to be exact.
AFC South
1. Houston Texans (10-6)
Ugh, I hate this pick. I'm a big fan of, "if you've always done something, prove otherwise until I pick it" (whether it's bad or good). And, let's face it, every year, everyone is big on the Texans, and then they let everyone down. I'm proud to say I never fall for this with them, but I mean, with Peyton Manning being out for way longer than we thought, and no other great competition in the division, it's now or never, right? The schedule isn't brutal, either. I think if they can't win this year, they should be forced to contract.
2. Tennessee Titans (7-9)
A big change of culture in Tennessee this year. Obviously, Matt Hasselbeck isn't part of the future, but he should be good enough to not keep them terrible, which had essentially been his career motto in Seattle.
3. Indianapolis Colts (5-11)
I generally pick the Colts the complete opposite of the Texans: prove you won't win all these games and the division, and then I'll pick against you. But with Manning's sudden neck surgery and an uncertainty on when he will return this year, if at all, yikes, they're in trouble. No team needs one player more than the Colts, and we're about to find out why. When the only hope is that an ancient Kerry Collins doesn't get hurt so we don't have to see Curtis Painter, that's trouble. The good news is, they might become so bad that they end up with a top-tier draft pick that they can use for years to come.
4. Jacksonville Jaguars (4-12)
Very odd decision to let David Garrard go right before the season starts, especially when Blaine Gabbert isn't going to be thrown right into the fire. Keeping Maurice Jones-Drew on the field will be their only chance of staying competitive.
AFC West
1. San Diego Chargers (12-4)
I'm completely buying into the hype, which is strange, because as a fan, I usually don't do that sort of thing, but everything is in place. Barring significant injuries, this is going to be a really tough offense to contain. Philip Rivers has "passing title" written all over him considering the miracles he worked last year throwing to receivers named Seyi Ajirotutu and Legedu Naanee. Replace that with Vincent Jackson and Antonio Gates, and good luck. Plus, the Bolts had a historically bad special teams coverage unit last year, and with the kickoff rule change, added to the fact that no one could be that bad twice, and that adds two or three extra wins to their total. Lastly, put me on record as saying the streak of them starting slow ends this year. They'll win four of their first five and cruise with no true divisional competition. Buy the hype.
2. Kansas City Chiefs (7-9)
The Chiefs benefited from a cupcake schedule last season; this year's isn't so kind. It starts off somewhat innocent, then weeks 11-15 are at the Patriots, home for the Steelers, at the Bears, at the Jets, and home against the Packers. Parlay that with three of four losses against the Chargers and Raiders, plus another random one sprinkled in, and there's nine losses.
3. Oakland Raiders (7-9)
The offense has a chance to be good, but they'll never be a playoff team again under Al Davis.
4. Denver Broncos (5-11)
Honestly, they're not going to contend anyway. They should have just traded Kyle Orton for a draft pick and let everyone see if Tim Tebow was still worth talking about. If he is, great, that'll sell some tickets and merchandise, and perhaps give them a game plan for the future. If not, then the hype ends and we can move on.
Friday, August 19, 2011
Why CM Punk/Kevin Nash Makes Sense
This article comes on the heels of CM Punk's commencement over the past two months to what is being labeled as the "Reality Era". Anyone reading this probably already knows the details of Punk's resume these past couple months: a scathing worked-shoot promo, an epic match with a Wrestlemania meets Super Bowl-esque atmosphere, a departure from the company, a return, another great Pay-Per-View match, a title win, a title defense, a title loss, and a plethora of amazing, revolution-inspiring moments on the microphone in between. Let's face it, Punk alone has made watching wrestling funner than it has been in about ten years.
That leads us to the present and Kevin Nash's sudden involvement with Punk. First off, on the verbal confrontation between the two last Monday night, it was clear that, if it's possible to have ring rust, Nash had mic rust and got blown out of the water by Punk, who seemed to try as hard as he could to sell Nash's insults but to no avail. Not surprisingly Nash, who has always had a reputation for cutting promos that are too inside about the business while going over fans' heads, did just that, and got hardly the reaction that I'm sure WWE had hoped for.
With all of this, and the apparent fact that Punk is now out of the title picture with John Cena and Alberto Del Rio now verbally squaring off, the general consensus that I've gotten is that people are upset that Punk is not in the main event right as his star was rising at its highest. At first, I agreed. But the more I thought, the more it made sense that this is a great move.
For starters, if WWE wants to groom Punk into being a top-tier babyface to lead this revolution, he needs to be involved in a feud where one hundred percent of the audience can get behind him, not just half like with John Cena. Punk already has the adult males on his side; if WWE can grab him the women and children who will cheer for whoever the good guy is (see: Cena fans), he has the potential to eventually have the crowd behind him at Austin-levels down the road. This reason alone is enough that have this program between him and Nash make sense.
Secondly, for those saying, "well, Punk could have feuded with Del Rio for the title and been the total babyface with the crowd," while that's true, where does that leave Cena? The thing with Cena is, he is basically built around needing to be in the title picture to have an interesting storyline. There's just not a lot of layers to his character beyond that. Punk, on the other hand, doesn't need the title to have an interesting storyline. And in essence, once he finally bests Nash over the next few months, this puts him in an even better position down the line to go for that WWE title rather than the company blowing their load too soon.
Furthermore, this gives Raw a main event-calibur second program, along side the WWE title picture. This used to be the case all the time in the Attitude Era when stars were plentiful, when Steve Austin and The Rock could be in two different programs that both had Pay-Per-View closing quality. WWE needs to build more stars; this is the way to go. Also, more quality stories will mean less filler material, which will mean a rise in viewers, which will lead to higher ratings.
Another reason why this storyline will work is its unpredictability. Already, between CM Punk, Kevin Nash, Triple H, Stephanie McMahon, and John Laurinaitis, plus the prospect of not knowing who is going to end up being aligned with whom, this combo of people offer more branches on the storyline tree than ways to order a burger at McDonald's. Sure, you'd have to imagine that Punk ultimately wins what is going to become a feud with Nash, but wrestling is oftentimes more about the journey than the destination. Are Nash and Johnny Ace together? Is Steph in on it too? Will she and Triple H be on different sides here? Or will all of them be trying to take down Punk in a throwback to the Corporation vs. Austin? The only thing certain is that there will be more than a few swerves and jaw-dropping promos along the way, so we should just sit back and enjoy the story unfold.
Lastly, this storyline is not only going to push CM Punk, but Triple H's new role as COO as well. And hey, normally anything that elevates Mr. H's (as R-Truth would say) ends up self-centered and with the other parties involved buried. This photoshopped pic I found via Grantland.com, via somewhere else, just about sums it up (the fact that they put TNA's X Division title made me laugh out loud). But in this instance, where he really needs to come off as the guy in charge, it is necessary for him to get over with a storyline like this, whether he plays a protagonist or a heel.
Add this up while introducing Laurinaitis in his new on-screen role, while also bringing back Stephanie and Nash back into the mix after so long, and this storyline sets up beautifully to put over all parties involved, while most importantly pushing Punk as the program's top star and elevating him in the public eye as a legitimate "superstar". Just because he's no longer in the main event after one of the greatest stretches for a performer in in the past decade, don't fall asleep at the wheel for what comes next. In recent years, I would have said that WWE would screw this up and drop the ball. Not this time. The faith has been restored. They earned that in large part to CM Punk.
P.S. This is just fantasy armchair booking, but if Jericho were to come back in the semi-near future and enter a one-on-one program as CM Punk's antagonist, that would be wrestling heaven. Between the two of them being geniuses of the business, top-notch wrestlers, five-star talkers, and a stubbornness to settle for nothing less than greatness in a program, any storyline that they could produce would have a strong chance at being an all-time, legendary story.
That leads us to the present and Kevin Nash's sudden involvement with Punk. First off, on the verbal confrontation between the two last Monday night, it was clear that, if it's possible to have ring rust, Nash had mic rust and got blown out of the water by Punk, who seemed to try as hard as he could to sell Nash's insults but to no avail. Not surprisingly Nash, who has always had a reputation for cutting promos that are too inside about the business while going over fans' heads, did just that, and got hardly the reaction that I'm sure WWE had hoped for.
With all of this, and the apparent fact that Punk is now out of the title picture with John Cena and Alberto Del Rio now verbally squaring off, the general consensus that I've gotten is that people are upset that Punk is not in the main event right as his star was rising at its highest. At first, I agreed. But the more I thought, the more it made sense that this is a great move.
For starters, if WWE wants to groom Punk into being a top-tier babyface to lead this revolution, he needs to be involved in a feud where one hundred percent of the audience can get behind him, not just half like with John Cena. Punk already has the adult males on his side; if WWE can grab him the women and children who will cheer for whoever the good guy is (see: Cena fans), he has the potential to eventually have the crowd behind him at Austin-levels down the road. This reason alone is enough that have this program between him and Nash make sense.
Secondly, for those saying, "well, Punk could have feuded with Del Rio for the title and been the total babyface with the crowd," while that's true, where does that leave Cena? The thing with Cena is, he is basically built around needing to be in the title picture to have an interesting storyline. There's just not a lot of layers to his character beyond that. Punk, on the other hand, doesn't need the title to have an interesting storyline. And in essence, once he finally bests Nash over the next few months, this puts him in an even better position down the line to go for that WWE title rather than the company blowing their load too soon.
Furthermore, this gives Raw a main event-calibur second program, along side the WWE title picture. This used to be the case all the time in the Attitude Era when stars were plentiful, when Steve Austin and The Rock could be in two different programs that both had Pay-Per-View closing quality. WWE needs to build more stars; this is the way to go. Also, more quality stories will mean less filler material, which will mean a rise in viewers, which will lead to higher ratings.
Another reason why this storyline will work is its unpredictability. Already, between CM Punk, Kevin Nash, Triple H, Stephanie McMahon, and John Laurinaitis, plus the prospect of not knowing who is going to end up being aligned with whom, this combo of people offer more branches on the storyline tree than ways to order a burger at McDonald's. Sure, you'd have to imagine that Punk ultimately wins what is going to become a feud with Nash, but wrestling is oftentimes more about the journey than the destination. Are Nash and Johnny Ace together? Is Steph in on it too? Will she and Triple H be on different sides here? Or will all of them be trying to take down Punk in a throwback to the Corporation vs. Austin? The only thing certain is that there will be more than a few swerves and jaw-dropping promos along the way, so we should just sit back and enjoy the story unfold.
Lastly, this storyline is not only going to push CM Punk, but Triple H's new role as COO as well. And hey, normally anything that elevates Mr. H's (as R-Truth would say) ends up self-centered and with the other parties involved buried. This photoshopped pic I found via Grantland.com, via somewhere else, just about sums it up (the fact that they put TNA's X Division title made me laugh out loud). But in this instance, where he really needs to come off as the guy in charge, it is necessary for him to get over with a storyline like this, whether he plays a protagonist or a heel.
Add this up while introducing Laurinaitis in his new on-screen role, while also bringing back Stephanie and Nash back into the mix after so long, and this storyline sets up beautifully to put over all parties involved, while most importantly pushing Punk as the program's top star and elevating him in the public eye as a legitimate "superstar". Just because he's no longer in the main event after one of the greatest stretches for a performer in in the past decade, don't fall asleep at the wheel for what comes next. In recent years, I would have said that WWE would screw this up and drop the ball. Not this time. The faith has been restored. They earned that in large part to CM Punk.
P.S. This is just fantasy armchair booking, but if Jericho were to come back in the semi-near future and enter a one-on-one program as CM Punk's antagonist, that would be wrestling heaven. Between the two of them being geniuses of the business, top-notch wrestlers, five-star talkers, and a stubbornness to settle for nothing less than greatness in a program, any storyline that they could produce would have a strong chance at being an all-time, legendary story.
Tuesday, June 21, 2011
Quick Raw Recap Re: CM Punk, R-Truth, and Good Wrestling
After watching last night's (06/21/11) Monday Night Raw, I turned off the TV and, for the first time in quite some time, was thrilled with the program as a whole. I feel like Raw has been a little better than usual recently, but there are still boring and wasted segments far too often. That wasn't the case last night, and three points stuck out in my mind when all was said and done, so let me briefly touch upon those.
Firstly, I have to talk about CM Punk. I am admittedly biased in favor of Punk (with Jericho gone at the moment, Punk has moved into my top spot as personal favorite), but it really sucks that the rumors were true and he's walking away for now. Still, I thought his promos were awesome, and even marked out a bit when he called himself a wrestler and actually spoke the words World Wrestling Entertainment (it's sad that on a wrestling program, you get excited when someone says taboo words such as "wrestling" or calls the company by its name, but that's the state we're in here). But ultimately, if he's going to go out, I think it was great that they decided to use his contract running out as the actual reason in storyline for his departure next month. Having that final match before his hiatus take place in Chicago, his home town, is that much more exciting.
On a side note, let me explain why Punk gets so much of my praise. To me, he's this generation's Chris Jericho, and to go further into that, I feel that both of those guys are the wrestling equivalent to a five-tool player in baseball (someone who hits for average and power, has speed, can field well, and has a strong arm...basically someone who can do it all). As it pertains to wrestling, these two have what I feel are the five "do it all" tools for pro wrestling: someone who can wrestle well within his own skill set/wrestle against any style, carry a bad opponent, cut a great promo, be entertaining as both a face and a heel, and have an intricate, interesting storyline centered around them. Jericho had it (until he returns, I sadly must refer to him in the past tense), and Punk definitely has it. It's a shame that for whatever reasons involved, he's walking away. Hopefully it won't be permanent.
Sticking with baseball analogies, if CM Punk is the equivalent to a guy in fantasy baseball who has been ranked number one all year with solid numbers across the board, then R-Truth is absolutely the guy who has been unbelievably on fire for two months straight and threatening for that spot. I always knew if they pushed Truth he would be good, but I don't think anyone could have imagined that he would have been this good. We already knew he could wrestle, but good word, every promo he cuts is a 10. When he said, "I got okie doked by Little Jimmy!", not only did I pause my DVR so I could laugh hysterically, then replay it three times in a row, but I officially named that the line of the year. If nothing else, R-Truth is, in my mind, somewhat of a throwback to attitude era heels such as Edge, Christian, and Kurt Angle. Not only do you take him seriously as a competitor and his in-storyline gripes, but he's always funny, we're always happy to see him, and the show is better for having him on it.
While I'm at it, let me not understate the importance R-Truth's creation of "Little Jimmys". As an adult male that hates John Cena (like most other adult males), we never had a name to call all of those stupid, mindless little kids who don't know any better but to cheer for Cena...they were just stupid little Cena fans. Now we have something: Little Jimmys. And dammit, that name couldn't be any more perfect and hilarious.
Speaking of R-Truth, the entire promo with him, Christian, and The Miz was complete gold. Aside from The Rock's return promo (which, let's face it, was legendary), that three man weave from last night may have been the most entertaining in-ring promo in the last few years.
Lastly, what made last night's Raw such a great show was that the matches, for the most part, were actually good, enjoyable, and had a nice pace to them. Dolph Ziggler vs. Kofi Kingston in the two out of three falls match was great and featured awesome WRESTLING. The triple threat match between CM Punk, Rey Mysterio, and Alberto Del Rio was excellent for the fact that unlike most WWE three ways, all three men were in the ring at the same time for a good portion of the match. Bryan Danielson against Cody Rhodes was solid, as expected, and the main event was entertaining as well (all matches like that should be elimination style, like last night).
It's amazing, but great WRESTLING + great promos = great show. Who knew.
Firstly, I have to talk about CM Punk. I am admittedly biased in favor of Punk (with Jericho gone at the moment, Punk has moved into my top spot as personal favorite), but it really sucks that the rumors were true and he's walking away for now. Still, I thought his promos were awesome, and even marked out a bit when he called himself a wrestler and actually spoke the words World Wrestling Entertainment (it's sad that on a wrestling program, you get excited when someone says taboo words such as "wrestling" or calls the company by its name, but that's the state we're in here). But ultimately, if he's going to go out, I think it was great that they decided to use his contract running out as the actual reason in storyline for his departure next month. Having that final match before his hiatus take place in Chicago, his home town, is that much more exciting.
On a side note, let me explain why Punk gets so much of my praise. To me, he's this generation's Chris Jericho, and to go further into that, I feel that both of those guys are the wrestling equivalent to a five-tool player in baseball (someone who hits for average and power, has speed, can field well, and has a strong arm...basically someone who can do it all). As it pertains to wrestling, these two have what I feel are the five "do it all" tools for pro wrestling: someone who can wrestle well within his own skill set/wrestle against any style, carry a bad opponent, cut a great promo, be entertaining as both a face and a heel, and have an intricate, interesting storyline centered around them. Jericho had it (until he returns, I sadly must refer to him in the past tense), and Punk definitely has it. It's a shame that for whatever reasons involved, he's walking away. Hopefully it won't be permanent.
Sticking with baseball analogies, if CM Punk is the equivalent to a guy in fantasy baseball who has been ranked number one all year with solid numbers across the board, then R-Truth is absolutely the guy who has been unbelievably on fire for two months straight and threatening for that spot. I always knew if they pushed Truth he would be good, but I don't think anyone could have imagined that he would have been this good. We already knew he could wrestle, but good word, every promo he cuts is a 10. When he said, "I got okie doked by Little Jimmy!", not only did I pause my DVR so I could laugh hysterically, then replay it three times in a row, but I officially named that the line of the year. If nothing else, R-Truth is, in my mind, somewhat of a throwback to attitude era heels such as Edge, Christian, and Kurt Angle. Not only do you take him seriously as a competitor and his in-storyline gripes, but he's always funny, we're always happy to see him, and the show is better for having him on it.
While I'm at it, let me not understate the importance R-Truth's creation of "Little Jimmys". As an adult male that hates John Cena (like most other adult males), we never had a name to call all of those stupid, mindless little kids who don't know any better but to cheer for Cena...they were just stupid little Cena fans. Now we have something: Little Jimmys. And dammit, that name couldn't be any more perfect and hilarious.
Speaking of R-Truth, the entire promo with him, Christian, and The Miz was complete gold. Aside from The Rock's return promo (which, let's face it, was legendary), that three man weave from last night may have been the most entertaining in-ring promo in the last few years.
Lastly, what made last night's Raw such a great show was that the matches, for the most part, were actually good, enjoyable, and had a nice pace to them. Dolph Ziggler vs. Kofi Kingston in the two out of three falls match was great and featured awesome WRESTLING. The triple threat match between CM Punk, Rey Mysterio, and Alberto Del Rio was excellent for the fact that unlike most WWE three ways, all three men were in the ring at the same time for a good portion of the match. Bryan Danielson against Cody Rhodes was solid, as expected, and the main event was entertaining as well (all matches like that should be elimination style, like last night).
It's amazing, but great WRESTLING + great promos = great show. Who knew.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)